|  | Author: Malcolm Gladwell
Publisher: Little, Brown and Company
List Price: $27.99
Buy New: $10.00
as of 11/24/2009 08:14 CST details
You Save: $17.99 (64%)
New (97) Used (52) Collectible (13) from $9.14
Seller: Roseanna Rome
Rating:  789 reviews
Sales Rank: 36
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Unknown), English (Published)
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Pages: 320
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1
Dimensions (in): 8.3 x 5.6 x 1.2
ISBN: 0316017922
Dewey Decimal Number: 302
EAN: 9780316017923
ASIN: 0316017922
Publication Date: November 18, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Brand new, never been used
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 771-775 of 789
As delicious and stimulating as a tall cappuccino, but similarly unnourishing November 21, 2008
Jeff Kelleher (San Diego, CA)
3 out of 6 found this review helpful
Gladwell's "The Tipping Point" and "Blink" generated thousands of dinner-party conversations. This book will continue the string.
His subject is success and how it is attained. Not routine success, but "outlying"--exceptional--success.
Gladwell is a forthright scavenger of others' ideas and research. His test for appropriation is, "No kidding! I never would have thought of that!" His special skill is turning ideas into melodrama. So this book, like his earlier ones, is a collection of stories, each a parable. He is a terrific storyteller.
Where, when, and to whom you were born are decisive, right? Well, yes, but not always in the obvious ways. Joe Flom, for example, born to poor Jewish garment-makers in New York City in 1930. His entrepreneur parents taught him how to fend for himself. His birth date fell in a demographic trough, so he got easy admission to student-short schools. Being Jewish kept him out of white-shoe Wall Street law firms. So he and three others set up their own firm and took the work that "gentlemanly" lawyers wouldn't do, litigation and corporate takeovers. The 1970s boom in these fields made Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom the premier firm in the country in takeover practice. LACK of privileged birth can be an advantage
Some of Gladwell's stuff is old hat. For example, intelligence matters up to a point--about a 120 IQ. Above that, there is little correlation between intelligence and success. The decisive factors are found in people skills, or what he calls "practical intelligence".
Some of his stuff is head-snapping. Why did Korean Air have seventeen times more crashes per million miles than United? The reason is cultural. He explains brilliantly, with a saga of air crashes and their causes that you can't put down.
Some of his stuff is whimsical. One little-known reason for The Beatles' success was a grueling pre-fame soujourn in Hamburg, where they played eight- and ten-hour sets in strip clubs, seven nights a week for a year and a half, while their old pals in Liverpool were playing one- and two-hours sets a couple of nights a week. McCartney and Lennon were gifted, no question, but without this intensive skill-sharpening, the band might have been just another bunch of Liverpool hacks. Genius requires 10,000 hours of practice.
It is a mistake to suppose that this is just another simple-minded attack on "privilege". Talent and hard work are necessary to success, Gladwell repeatedly reminds us. But outlying success requires more. It "is grounded in a web of advantages and inheritances, some deserved, some not, some earned, some just plain lucky...."
The book is more diverting than profound. Nevertheless, you can read it in a single evening, and there are a lot worse diversions.
A worthy read but ........ November 21, 2008
Robert Busko (Waynesville, NC USA)
3 out of 7 found this review helpful
I have to give Malcolm Gladwell a hefty pat on the back for his attempt to capture the essence of success in Outliers: The Story Success. I also have to commend him for stressing the point that hard work, and to a degree, luck, is required to be successful. I spotted that tidbit while scanning through the book and decided that perhaps there was something here after all.
Gladwell may turn out to be this generation's Studs Terkel in that he has a need to look at subjects the rest of us take for granted.
I do have just a wee bit of a problem with his reluctance to ask questions about the studies he quotes. I also think that when Gladwell hits upon an idea that seems to work as an explanation for a conclusion (Asian math prowess and raising rice) he stops there; giving virtually no thought to the subject beyond that point. For example we've been growing rice in this country for centuries. Shouldn't we be equally advanced in mathematics as students of Asian ancestry? Why aren't we? Perhaps in something similar to the 10,000 hour rule we need to raise rice for another thousand years before we accrue any benefits from that activity. Obtuse? I don't think so.
When you look at Mozart, Oppenheimer, or any of the others cited, no one can argue that they were not world class successes; in one narrow aspect of their lives. Most were also miserable failures in other parts of their lives. Einstein was an absolute failure as a father and husband. Oppenheimer was disgraced by the American government. Mozart died in misery. Point to any successful personality and then take a second look.
Success comes from talent, intelligence, and a lot of hard work. I also very much like that Gladwell sees human workers as the backbone to corporate success even stressing that companies should invest in workers as a resource. This is an idea that is not new but has been floating around for fifty or sixty years. Perhaps, in the present economic debacle corporate leaders will begin to heed it.
The truth of the matter is that despite my problems with Outliers, I'm giving it four stars because it is a book that provokes thought, and we need a lot more of that in our society. Gladwell is an entertaining writer/researcher/thinker. I thought his book Tipping Point should be considered for book of the decade. Outliers, while not quite up to that level of quality is sure to be a successful book. Finally, Gladwell should be congratulated for turning out books like Tipping Point and Outliers. I may not agree with all of his conclusions but at least he's asking the right questions.
I recommend.
Peace always
 4 stars for fun, but 2 stars for originality November 21, 2008
Nick Tasler (Minneapolis, MN)
522 out of 613 found this review helpful
Gladwell has done it again...sort of. I would have categorized this book as a 4 or 5 star read like his previous two installments--Blink and The Tipping Point, except he lost a few originality points this time around.
Gladwell's knack for making a reader say "huh, interesting..." is something for other writers to marvel at. I'm convinced that he could pen a book called "Green: It's the color of grass," and he would write it in such a way that would inspire most of us to say "huh...who knew?!?"
But in the case of Outliers the "huh..." factor has little to do with the ideas found in the book, and are almost exclusively the result of Gladwell's keen sense of how to make the ordinary and mundane sound exciting and new. This is especially true in the two chapters devoted to debunking the myth that intelligence is the key to success. Unfortunately, Dan Goleman beat him to the punch way back in 1995 with his book "Emotional Intelligence: Why it matters more than IQ." With a quick sleight of hand, Gladwell cites Robert Sternberg's label of "practical intelligence," instead of calling it emotional intelligence. But let's be honest, here, the only difference is Goleman says "tem-ay-toe," and Gladwell says "tem-ah-toe."
The other flaw is that nothing in it is terribly useful for practical application. It's no secret to anyone in the business of hiring that most selection techniques are abysmal predictors of on-the-job success. What we are left with as a takeaway from Outliers is that factors of chance like the ability to practice a skill for 10,000 hours--mostly during childhood--is the key to predicting future success. Get your kids started today...as long as you know when the next Industrial Revolution or Internet Age is going to occur. Aside from emotional intelligence (aka "practical intelligence") most of these are factors that we just can't do much about. Unfortunately, we already knew that.
Alas, however, Malcolm Gladwell is a professional writer, and not a professional researcher. If readers keep that in mind, they won't be too disappointed by the methods or originality of the research. His job is to weave together an interesting story, which is something Gladwell does exceedingly well. If all you want is some good entertainment and fodder for cocktail party discussions, Outliers might make a nice addition to your bookshelves.
Nick Tasler is the author of The Impulse Factor: Why Some of Us Play It Safe and Others Risk It All
Good book, but suffers from Survivorship Bias November 21, 2008
David Kottcamp (Denver, CO)
12 out of 20 found this review helpful
This book, much like Gladwell's other books, is an enjoyable and educational read. He presents many interesting research findings in a cogent and very readable manner, weaving a tale of the importance of chance in success.
One issue I take with this book, is that it suffers from survivorship bias; he examines very successful people, like Bill Gates, and decomposes their lives to see what helped get them there; time and again, showing the importance of chance in people's success. This is not to say he is making the claim that chance is the sole reason for success, his book is replete with examples of the importance of practice & perseverance to attain success. Nevertheless, he does not analyze a cross section of people who had similar 'chance events' yet did not become the next Bill Gates or Malcolm Gladwell.
In the case of Bill Gates, he attributes a great deal of his success to the fact that Bill Gates had access to computers (every abnormal at that time) through a series of chance events, none of which was really in Bill Gates' control. Gladwell postulates that had this not happened, Bill Gates probably wouldn't be the richest man alive today.
However, to really determine the role that his access to a computer played (and thereby eliminating survivorship bias), Gladwell would need to examine every other child who had access to a computer at that time; surely Bill Gates and Steve Jobs weren't the only ones who had access to a computer. Of those kids that did have access to computers, how many attained similar wealth? If it turns out that several thousand kids had access to computers, then this 'chance' might fairly be said to have contributed little to the success of Bill Gates.
This is not to say that the premise of this book isn't in part undeniably true, we are all where we are, due to chance events (or as Malcolm explains it: events that are beyond our control, due to familial, cultural or epochal reasons).
I recommend reading this book, as it is an engaging read, weaving together information from numerous disciplines; just be aware of the survivorship bias that exists throughout.
 For Men Only November 21, 2008
Renee Mumford
31 out of 58 found this review helpful
For males traveling by air, this is a nice ego boosting read. For females traveling by air, do not waste your money on this machismo, female deficit, piece of crap. I did waste my time and money, bought it on the way back from a trip thinking I might learn a secret or two about success. There are none. Total chest pounding praises on how to be a very rich male. Mother Theresa, Princess Diana, Oprah Winfrey, JK Rowling are several women I wish had been included in this stupid book. I do not recommend it.
Showing reviews 771-775 of 789
|
|
|
